In the coming weeks, we'll be offering tips for weddings as we get closer to the heart of wedding season.
The first wedding tip is about your engagement photographs. Yes, they are related to your wedding.
First, you really should think about having a professional create your engagement photographs. The reason is the following tip. The person you hire for your engagements photographs should also be the person you are hiring for your wedding. Here's the reasons why.
1) You will have an opportunity to start a rapport with the person that is going to be working along side you to make your wedding day great. Use this chance to get acquainted and make your wedding day that much better.
2) You may find you don't really get along with the photographer and have time to do something about it. This means, of course, you want to find a photographer that understands you want to do the engagement session as a way of testing the waters. Many photographers include an engagement session in their wedding packages. If this is the case, ask them if they will credit this back if you decide to book your wedding with them. With all this in mind, you'll want to schedule engagement photographs early.
3) Many products can be customized for the telling of your love story from the engagement through the wedding instead of just the wedding. More options is good.
Sunday, January 17, 2010
Thursday, January 14, 2010
Photography Date Announcement
Some of you had asked to be updated. So, for those following here on my blog or on facebook, we will be photographing at Northland Christian on Tuesday, January 19. This is for the winter sports as well as catching some of the students and groupings we missed for the yearbook.
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Upcoming Bridal Shows...
Saturday, January 9, 2010
Nikon D900 Coming?
Rumblings are beginning to be heard about a new DSLR from Nikon. It's going under the designation of the D900.
While a new cool piece of gear from Nikon would be great, there is some strangeness to where it would find its place in the Nikon roadmap. It's not simply a matter of making a camera to fit a market for Nikon. For those that are not familiar with Nikon, here's a brief look at their naming structures from their inception to now. And, yes, they are highly predictable and consistent.
Starting with film cameras, the professional models had the designation of Fx, starting with the F and ending with the still prominent F6. The next step down from the flagship film cameras was the F100. There was only one Fxxx, but you'll see the parallels in a moment. The SLR consumer film cameras had a designation of N. So, the highest end consumer camera was the N90. They also had Nxxxx numbers like the N2020. Each designation represented a different market for them, including separate designations for even the point and shoots like the Coolpix. Lastly, it's important to note that the higher numbers always represented the better camera (in each market). So, a Nikon progression would be to start with two digits, either even numbers or odds (N50, N70, N90). Then they would move to the other in replacing those models. Then they would move to the off numbers like N65 and N75. You get the picture (yes, the puns are always intended).
So, what does the DSLR market look like for them? They started out with the landmark D1 and have moved up the numbers like expected. Any small advancements get an S added to the name like the new D3s. The highest end gets the X, currently the D3x. They have recently added their Dxxxx models which are the D3000 and the D5000. Then there are the Dxx models that have followed their normal naming process, D40, D60, D80, and D90. Finally, there are the Dxxx models. There is, currently, the D300/D300s and the D700.
So, history lesson over, what is so strange about the D900 rumored? The D900 would max out that number market leaving only room to insert a new model between the D300s and the D700. Sure, you could add the D800, but the D900 basically fills that spot because anything much greater than the D700 would be as good as or better than the Dx models. Confusing? Does it really matter? No, on both questions. However, if the rumors are true, it will be quite interesting to see what other models will be replaced, including the D3x. Ah, now you see where I'm going! A D900 will mean there's probably other new goodies to follow. It's all a numbers game...
For more information on the latest Nikon rumors, go to the Nikon Rumors site.
While a new cool piece of gear from Nikon would be great, there is some strangeness to where it would find its place in the Nikon roadmap. It's not simply a matter of making a camera to fit a market for Nikon. For those that are not familiar with Nikon, here's a brief look at their naming structures from their inception to now. And, yes, they are highly predictable and consistent.
Starting with film cameras, the professional models had the designation of Fx, starting with the F and ending with the still prominent F6. The next step down from the flagship film cameras was the F100. There was only one Fxxx, but you'll see the parallels in a moment. The SLR consumer film cameras had a designation of N. So, the highest end consumer camera was the N90. They also had Nxxxx numbers like the N2020. Each designation represented a different market for them, including separate designations for even the point and shoots like the Coolpix. Lastly, it's important to note that the higher numbers always represented the better camera (in each market). So, a Nikon progression would be to start with two digits, either even numbers or odds (N50, N70, N90). Then they would move to the other in replacing those models. Then they would move to the off numbers like N65 and N75. You get the picture (yes, the puns are always intended).
So, what does the DSLR market look like for them? They started out with the landmark D1 and have moved up the numbers like expected. Any small advancements get an S added to the name like the new D3s. The highest end gets the X, currently the D3x. They have recently added their Dxxxx models which are the D3000 and the D5000. Then there are the Dxx models that have followed their normal naming process, D40, D60, D80, and D90. Finally, there are the Dxxx models. There is, currently, the D300/D300s and the D700.
So, history lesson over, what is so strange about the D900 rumored? The D900 would max out that number market leaving only room to insert a new model between the D300s and the D700. Sure, you could add the D800, but the D900 basically fills that spot because anything much greater than the D700 would be as good as or better than the Dx models. Confusing? Does it really matter? No, on both questions. However, if the rumors are true, it will be quite interesting to see what other models will be replaced, including the D3x. Ah, now you see where I'm going! A D900 will mean there's probably other new goodies to follow. It's all a numbers game...
For more information on the latest Nikon rumors, go to the Nikon Rumors site.
Thursday, January 7, 2010
A.W.Chris And Perfect Wedding Guide
Recently, we signed up with The Perfect Wedding Guide. So, you'll be able to see us in their upcoming book some time in March as well as on their web site as of right now. The link to check that out is here. Plus, we'll be doing a pair of bridal shows, one in February and one in March, so come check us out. We'd love to visit with you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
